President John Mahama’s 10-day ultimatum given to the Chief Justice, Her Ladyship Gertrude Araba Esaaba Sackey Torkornoo, to reply to three petitions seeking her removal, expires right this moment, 7 April 2025.
On 28 March, the President—by means of a letter signed by his Secretary, Dr Callistus Mahama—granted the days following a formal request by the Chief Justice herself.
This got here after the Presidency confirmed that the petitions had been forwarded to the Council of State for recommendation, in step with Article 146 of the 1992 Structure.
Kylian Mbappe addresses rumours of rigidity at Actual Madrid, and speaks about his relationship with Vinicius Junior. That is what he needed to say…
Ghanaian twin music duo Lali X Lola have shaved off their iconic pink hair in a symbolic transfer to name for unity between dancehall rivals Shatta Wale and Stonebwoy.
ALSO READ: Joyce Bawa Mogtari demands GH¢10 million, apology from Abronye DC for defamation
With the deadline now elapsed, studies recommend that the President has acquired a proper response from the Chief Justice, paving the way in which for the Council of State to supply its suggestions on the matter.
As Ghanaians await official communication with bated breath, listed here are 4 influential figures who’ve publicly urged President Mahama to rethink any try to take away the Chief Justice:
Prof Stephen Adei
Famend economist and former Rector of the Ghana Institute of Administration and Public Administration (GIMPA), Professor Stephen Adei, is among the many most outstanding voices cautioning against the Chief Justice’s dismissal.
He warned that any such motion—significantly one pushed by political motives—would erode the foundations of Ghana’s democracy and set up a troubling precedent for future governments.
Nii Ayikoi Otoo
Former Lawyer Common and Minister for Justice, Nii Ayikoi Otoo, has additionally raised considerations concerning the ongoing course of.
He underscored the necessity for due course of to be revered and criticised any strategy that depends on unverified claims or political stress moderately than substantiated proof.
Janet Nabla
The People’s National Party (PNP) has strongly condemned the choice to contain the Council of State in reviewing the petitions.
In a press release dated 27 March and signed by the get together’s Chairperson and Chief, Janet Nabla, the transfer was described as “unprecedented” and a transparent “betrayal of ladies.” The PNP argued that earlier administrations had upheld the independence of the judiciary and collaborated with Chief Justices no matter political leanings—one thing it claims the present authorities has did not do.
Nana Agyei Baffour Awuah
Manhyia South MP, Nana Agyei Baffour Awuah, additionally joined the refrain of warning. He warned of the dangers related to eradicating the Chief Justice with out agency justification.
He emphasised that such a choice might have lasting penalties for the judiciary’s credibility and Ghana’s democratic stability. He urged the Council of State to think about the long-term implications and to behave in defence of the authorized system’s integrity.
ALSO READ: Police officer slaps alleged thief with gun during confrontation at Adum (video)
Conclusion
The approaching resolution on whether or not to proceed with the potential elimination of Chief Justice Torkornoo extends past a mere authorized course of—it’s a pivotal second for Ghana’s judicial independence and democratic legacy. With the nation’s consideration firmly mounted on the Presidency, all eyes at the moment are on whether or not constitutional due course of will overcome political calculations.
