The authorized battle towards Dr. Johnson Asiama, a former Deputy Governor of the Financial institution of Ghana, has dragged on for over seven years, curbing his freedom and imposing vital monetary burdens in authorized charges. The costs levied towards him—breach of the Financial institution of Ghana Act and inflicting monetary loss—haven’t been substantiated, but the prosecution continued
even supposing no monetary loss occurred.
Extra considerably, Dr. Asiama grew to become the goal of political persecution as a result of he defended the legitimacy of sure monetary selections made underneath the Nationwide Democratic Congress (NDC) authorities and pushed again towards politically motivated accusations.
The New Patriotic Social gathering (NPP) authorities, which took over in 2017, noticed his actions as defiant and singled him out for authorized harassment. His prosecution was by no means about justice; it was about punishing a public official who refused to betray his rules. This text argues
why the case towards Dr. Asiama was a politically motivated witch hunt that ought to have by no means occurred.”
The political context of the prosecution
Following the NDC’s loss within the 2016 normal elections, the incoming NPP authorities launched into a collection of actions geared toward discrediting key figures from the earlier administration. Dr. Asiama, who had been vocal in defending the insurance policies of the NDC-led authorities, discovered himself on the centre of this crackdown. As a substitute of being acknowledged for
his position in sustaining monetary stability, he was focused as a part of a broader effort to demonize officers related to the earlier authorities.
The liquidity assist measures he licensed weren’t private selections however official Financial institution of Ghana insurance policies designed to forestall systemic collapse. Nonetheless, as a result of he didn’t distance himself from the NDC, he grew to become a handy scapegoat. The selective nature of his prosecution additional underscores the politically charged motives behind the case.
The context of the transactions
Between 2015 and 2016, UNIBANK was experiencing extreme liquidity constraints because of a confluence of things, together with delayed authorities funds for highway contracts and power sector-related exposures. A number of banks, together with UNIBANK, confronted imminent failure if no intervention was supplied. The Financial institution of Ghana, in its position because the lender of final resort, acted decisively to stabilize the banking sector by offering liquidity assist. These interventions weren’t arbitrary however adopted suggestions from the Banking Supervision Division and adhered to laid-down processes inside the Financial institution of Ghana.
On the time, UNIBANK’s liquidity disaster was exacerbated by massive withdrawals from establishments resembling COCOBOD, VRA, EDC, and Databank. UNIBANK had vital authorities receivables, estimated at GH¢850 million, which it relied on for future liquidity.
Given this case, the Financial institution of Ghana granted liquidity assist based mostly on customary procedures, making certain the steadiness of the monetary system. This was a systemic intervention slightly than a private determination by Dr. Asiama.
No monetary loss was incurred
The elemental flaw within the case towards Dr. Asiama is the assertion that his actions resulted in monetary loss to the state. This declare is demonstrably false. The GH¢150 million facility prolonged to UNIBANK has been repaid by UMB Financial institution, a proven fact that has been duly
offered in courtroom. Equally, the GH¢413.09 million prolonged to UT Financial institution was not squandered however utilized to fulfil important monetary obligations, together with curiosity funds to the Financial institution of Ghana, month-to-month reserve necessities, and worldwide mortgage settlements to forestall Ghanaian banks from being blacklisted by correspondent banks.
Moreover, out of the GH¢413.09 million, a good portion (GH¢289.98 million) was retained by the Financial institution of Ghana itself for varied funds, additional proving that the cash
was not mismanaged. The CEO of UT Financial institution, underneath cross-examination, confirmed that he submitted common utilization reviews to the Financial institution of Ghana, indicating that the funds had been correctly accounted for. Subsequently, the cost of inflicting monetary loss is baseless and ought to be dismissed very long time.
Selective prosecution and the position of different officers
A significant concern relating to Dr. Asiama’s prosecution is the selective nature of the costs. The liquidity assist supplied to UNIBANK and UT Financial institution was an official determination by the administration of the Financial institution of Ghana, accredited on the highest ranges. Different Deputy Governors
and senior officers performed key roles in these selections, but Dr. Asiama stays the one particular person going through authorized motion.
For example, the GH¢200 million liquidity assist granted to UNIBANK in December 2015 was accredited by then-First Deputy Governor Mr. Millison Narh. Equally, the GH¢450 million liquidity assist in March 2016 was signed off by Dr. Abdul-Nashiru Issahaku, the
Second Deputy Governor on the time. Each approvals adopted suggestions from the
Banking Supervision Division, reinforcing the truth that these had been institutional decisionsrather than private actions by Dr. Asiama.
If these liquidity helps had been unlawful, then all officers concerned, together with those that accredited comparable transactions earlier than Dr. Asiama’s tenure, also needs to be held accountable.
Nonetheless, concentrating on solely Dr. Asiama suggests a prejudicial strategy that lacks equity and consistency within the software of justice.
Compliance with banking procedures
Dr. Asiama’s actions had been consistent with customary banking procedures. The Financial institution of Ghana hadpreviously supplied comparable liquidity assist to banks going through misery, adhering to worldwide finest practices for central banking. These interventions weren’t reckless however had been a part of efforts to make sure monetary stability.
Furthermore, the choice to increase liquidity assist was based mostly on an official Board Decision dated September 19, 2016, which mandated the Financial institution of Ghana to assist systemically essential banks for as much as three years to revive regulatory compliance. The
decision particularly delegated authority to the administration of the Financial institution of Ghana to approve liquidity assist when mandatory.
Subsequently, Dr. Asiama was merely executing his official duties underneath the mandate of the central financial institution, and his prosecution for doing so is solely unjustified.
The human value of the political persecution
Past the authorized and monetary implications, the extended prosecution of Dr. Asiama has had a profound private toll. For the previous seven years, his freedom has been considerably curtailed, and he has needed to endure huge monetary prices in authorized defence. This has not solely affected him personally however has additionally impacted his household. At this level, with no concrete
proof of wrongdoing, it’s inhumane and unjust to proceed prosecuting a person who was merely finishing up official duties in good religion. Justice shouldn’t be weaponized, and authorized processes shouldn’t be used as a software for political vendettas.
Conclusion
The case towards Dr. Johnson Asiama was by no means about justice it was a political witch hunt orchestrated by the NPP authorities as a part of a broader try and silence and punish officers related to the earlier NDC administration. The liquidity assist supplied to
UNIBANK and UT Financial institution was an official Financial institution of Ghana coverage designed to stabilize the monetary sector. No monetary loss occurred, and the transactions had been absolutely accounted for.
Moreover, his prosecution was clearly selective, as different officers who accredited comparable liquidity assist packages stay uncharged.
Ghana should transfer past political divisions and deal with harnessing the experience of succesful professionals who may also help drive nationwide progress. Dr. Asiama is a seasoned economist whose goal strategy and dedication to sound monetary insurance policies can contribute meaningfully to fixing the countrys financial challenges.
As a nation, we ought to be encouraging downside solvers from all backgrounds to work collectively for a stronger and extra secure economic system. Justice calls for equity, however past that, Ghana wants a future the place competence, not political affiliation, determines who will get to serve. It’s time to drop this case and embrace a path towards a united, forward-looking nation.
